User:Profpatsch: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 13:

==== nixpkgs support matrix ====

Note: grahamc [https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-369589272 mentioned (via peti)] that SUSE uses a <code>ring-0</code>, <code>ring-1</code>, … naming for the different support levels, which we should adopt [https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-369395221 to not introduce any more confusion in nix(pkgs/OS) naming].

{| class="wikitable"

Line 74:

Line 76:

* '''Maintained''': maintained, probably only manually tested on the maintainer’s system

* '''Unmaintained''': no maintainer, might not be on the newest version or broken because of updated dependencies

The [https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/b5c8314f0ebadb6d8a9789cb2d646cbef8448073/MAINTAINERS#L92 <code>MAINTAINERS</code> file] of the Linux kernel has the following categories:

S: Status, one of the following:

Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.

Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.

Odd Fixes: It has a maintainer but they don't have time to do

much other than throw the odd patch in. See below..

Orphan: No current maintainer [but maybe you could take the

role as you write your new code].

Obsolete: Old code. Something tagged obsolete generally means

it has been replaced by a better system and you

should be using that.

</pre></code>

Especially the “there’s somebody paid to maintain this subsystem” label is an idea we should incorporate.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==== nixpkgs support matrix ====
+Note: grahamc [https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-369589272 mentioned (via peti)] that SUSE uses a <code>ring-0</code>, <code>ring-1</code>, … naming for the different support levels, which we should adopt [https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-369395221 to not introduce any more confusion in nix(pkgs/OS) naming].
 {| class="wikitable"
@@ Line 74: / Line 76: @@
 * '''Maintained''': maintained, probably only manually tested on the maintainer’s system
 * '''Unmaintained''': no maintainer, might not be on the newest version or broken because of updated dependencies
+The [https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/b5c8314f0ebadb6d8a9789cb2d646cbef8448073/MAINTAINERS#L92 <code>MAINTAINERS</code> file] of the Linux kernel has the following categories:
+<code><pre>
+S: Status, one of the following:
+  Supported:	Someone is actually paid to look after this.
+  Maintained:	Someone actually looks after it.
+  Odd Fixes:	It has a maintainer but they don't have time to do
+  much other than throw the odd patch in. See below..
+  Orphan:	No current maintainer [but maybe you could take the
+  role as you write your new code].
+  Obsolete:	Old code. Something tagged obsolete generally means
+  it has been replaced by a better system and you
+  should be using that.
+</pre></code>
+Especially the “there’s somebody paid to maintain this subsystem” label is an idea we should incorporate.