User:SigmaSquadron/Template:Evaluate: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Potential Issues == | == Potential Issues == | ||
* You could call some other <nowiki>{{{action}}}</nowiki>, like so: <nowiki>{{Evaluate|action=list-generations}}</nowiki>, and the message about evaluating your configuration would no longer make any sense. I expect editors to know better than that though. | * You could call some other <nowiki>{{{action}}}</nowiki>, like so: <nowiki>{{Evaluate|action=list-generations}}</nowiki>, and the message about evaluating your configuration would no longer make any sense. I expect editors to know better than that though. | ||
* This could be rewritten with just {{Evaluate|boot}}, and use {{{1}}} instead of {{{action}}}. I personally dislike this alternative syntax, but it may be preferable to editors. | |||
* The usage of <code>--use-remote-sudo</code> means that the command wouldn't work for those not using <code>sudo</code>. However, there is the tiny benefit that the evaluation and build process is no longer called by the root user, which may be helpful for those using flake-based evaluation. Also, it can point users on the right path when they begin to build systems remotely. | * The usage of <code>--use-remote-sudo</code> means that the command wouldn't work for those not using <code>sudo</code>. However, there is the tiny benefit that the evaluation and build process is no longer called by the root user, which may be helpful for those using flake-based evaluation. Also, it can point users on the right path when they begin to build systems remotely. |
Revision as of 09:27, 4 July 2024
Proposal
Alter the Template:Evaluate to support more commands than just switch
by providing the optional attribute action
. This change is backwards compatible and requires no changes to existing template calls.
About
This template is used to remind end-users that they need to rebuild for the changes to take effect. The optional attribute action
can be used to define the subcommand suggested by the tip.
Usage
Default Evaluate
Box:
{{Evaluate}}
Boot Evaluate
Box:
{{Evaluate|action=boot}}
Test Evaluate
Box:
{{Evaluate|action=test}}
Example
Default Evaluate
Box: (Called without action)
Boot Evaluate
Box:
Test Evaluate
Box:
Potential Issues
- You could call some other {{{action}}}, like so: {{Evaluate|action=list-generations}}, and the message about evaluating your configuration would no longer make any sense. I expect editors to know better than that though.
- This could be rewritten with just
- The usage of
--use-remote-sudo
means that the command wouldn't work for those not usingsudo
. However, there is the tiny benefit that the evaluation and build process is no longer called by the root user, which may be helpful for those using flake-based evaluation. Also, it can point users on the right path when they begin to build systems remotely.
Code
<noinclude>{{DISPLAYTITLE:Template:evaluate}} == About == This template is used to remind end-users that they need to rebuild for the changes to take effect. The optional attribute <code>action</code> can be used to define the subcommand suggested by the tip. == Usage == Default <code>Evaluate</code> Box: <pre> <nowiki>{{Evaluate}}</nowiki> </pre> Boot <code>Evaluate</code> Box: <pre> <nowiki>{{Evaluate|boot}}</nowiki> </pre> Test <code>Evaluate</code> Box: <pre> <nowiki>{{Evaluate|boot}}</nowiki> </pre> == Example == Default <code>Evaluate</code> Box: {{Evaluate}} Boot <code>Evaluate</code> Box: {{Evaluate|action=boot}} Test <code>Evaluate</code> Box: {{Evaluate|action=test}} </noinclude><includeonly>{{Tip |1=In order to '''affect''' your NixOS system by your nix-language-specific changes you must first '''evaluate''' it:{{Commands|$ nixos-rebuild {{{action|switch}}} --use-remote-sudo}}{{#ifeq: boot | {{{action}}} | Then, reboot:{{Commands|$ systemctl reboot}}}}{{#ifeq: test | {{{action}}} | '''Remember:''' any changes evaluated through <code>nixos-rebuild test</code> '''will not''' persist upon reboot.}}}}</includeonly>
, and use {{{1}}} instead of {{{action}}}. I personally dislike this alternative syntax, but it may be preferable to editors.
- The usage of