Template talk:Commands: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 8 April by Samueldr in topic Maybe delete?
→Maybe delete?: new section |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is this useful when we already have [[Template:Bc]]? | Is this useful when we already have [[Template:Bc]]? | ||
(unsigned from Sdht0) | |||
I think I agree in part, but from the other way around. I was thinking about removing both <tt>bc</tt> and <tt>ic</tt>. The main reason is that they don't map well to the visual editor. And then since <tt>commands</tt> also doesn't map well to the visual editor, removing it makes sense then. | |||
[[User:Samueldr|samueldr]] ([[User talk:Samueldr|talk]]) 02:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Oh, one thing that was making me think that <tt>commands</tt> has reasons to stay: style it differently from source code... But that can also be managed from <code><nowiki><syntaxhighlight></nowiki></code> I believe. | |||
[[User:Samueldr|samueldr]] ([[User talk:Samueldr|talk]]) 02:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 8 April 2024
Maybe delete?
Is this useful when we already have Template:Bc?
(unsigned from Sdht0)
I think I agree in part, but from the other way around. I was thinking about removing both bc and ic. The main reason is that they don't map well to the visual editor. And then since commands also doesn't map well to the visual editor, removing it makes sense then.
samueldr (talk) 02:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Oh, one thing that was making me think that commands has reasons to stay: style it differently from source code... But that can also be managed from <syntaxhighlight> I believe.