Package naming conventions: Difference between revisions

Patka (talk | contribs)
m Add <code> tags
Pigs (talk | contribs)
m Add category nixpkgs
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
! Use
! Use
|-
|-
| <code>-bin<code>
| <code>-bin</code>
|The binary is copied from upstream, not build from source using Nix. A <code>-bin</code> version is only available if a source-based version already exists, and there exists a meaninful difference between the two. An example is the Hashicorp Vault package that doesn't include the web UI, but the <code>-bin</code> version does.
|The binary is copied from upstream, not build from source using Nix. A <code>-bin</code> version is only available if a source-based version already exists, and there exists a meaninful difference between the two. An example is the Hashicorp Vault package that doesn't include the web UI, but the <code>-bin</code> version does.
|-
|-
Line 11: Line 11:
|Some packages provide options for customization that don't affect the main build, and is thus done in the <code>-unwrapped</code> package. The package is then wrapped to provide customization without having to recompile the package. This is an implementation detail, you generally don't want to directly use an <code>-unwrapped</code> version.
|Some packages provide options for customization that don't affect the main build, and is thus done in the <code>-unwrapped</code> package. The package is then wrapped to provide customization without having to recompile the package. This is an implementation detail, you generally don't want to directly use an <code>-unwrapped</code> version.
|}
|}
[[Category:Nixpkgs]]