PGP: Difference between revisions
m `sequoia-chameleon-gnupg` no longer depends on gnupg; upstream issue fixed |
Tag: Undo |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From [[wikipedia:Pretty_Good_Privacy|its dedicated Wikipedia article]] :<blockquote>'''Pretty Good Privacy''' ('''PGP''') is an [[wikipedia:Encryption_software|encryption program]] that provides [[wikipedia:Cryptographic|cryptographic]] [[wikipedia:Privacy|privacy]] and [[wikipedia:Authentication|authentication]] for [[wikipedia:Data_communication|data communication]]. PGP is used for [[wikipedia:Digital_signature|signing]], encrypting, and decrypting texts, [[wikipedia:Email|e-mails]], files, directories, and whole disk partitions and to increase the [[wikipedia:Security|security]] of e-mail communications. [[wikipedia:Phil_Zimmermann|Phil Zimmermann]] developed PGP in 1991.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|last=Zimmermann|first=Philip R.|author-link=Phil Zimmermann|date=1999|title=Why I Wrote PGP|url=https://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html|website=Essays on PGP|publisher=Phil Zimmermann & Associates LLC|access-date=July 6, 2014|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624122110/https://philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | From [[wikipedia:Pretty_Good_Privacy|its dedicated Wikipedia article]] :<blockquote>'''Pretty Good Privacy''' ('''PGP''') is an [[wikipedia:Encryption_software|encryption program]] that provides [[wikipedia:Cryptographic|cryptographic]] [[wikipedia:Privacy|privacy]] and [[wikipedia:Authentication|authentication]] for [[wikipedia:Data_communication|data communication]]. PGP is used for [[wikipedia:Digital_signature|signing]], encrypting, and decrypting texts, [[wikipedia:Email|e-mails]], files, directories, and whole disk partitions and to increase the [[wikipedia:Security|security]] of e-mail communications. [[wikipedia:Phil_Zimmermann|Phil Zimmermann]] developed PGP in 1991.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|last=Zimmermann|first=Philip R.|author-link=Phil Zimmermann|date=1999|title=Why I Wrote PGP|url=https://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html|website=Essays on PGP|publisher=Phil Zimmermann & Associates LLC|access-date=July 6, 2014|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624122110/https://philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html|url-status=live}}<cite id="CITEREFZimmermann1999" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">[[Phil Zimmermann|Zimmermann, Philip R.]] (1999). [https://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html "Why I Wrote PGP"]. ''Essays on PGP''. Phil Zimmermann & Associates LLC. [https://web.archive.org/web/20180624122110/https://philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html Archived] from the original on June 24, 2018<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 6,</span> 2014</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=Essays+on+PGP&rft.atitle=Why+I+Wrote+PGP&rft.date=1999&rft.aulast=Zimmermann&rft.aufirst=Philip+R.&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.philzimmermann.com%2FEN%2Fessays%2FWhyIWrotePGP.html&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> | ||
PGP and similar software follow the OpenPGP standard ([[wikipedia:Request_for_Comments|RFC]] 4880), an [[wikipedia:Open_standard|open standard]] for [[wikipedia:Encryption|encrypting]] and decrypting [[wikipedia:Data|data]]. Modern versions of PGP are [[wikipedia:Interoperability|interoperable]] with [[wikipedia:GnuPG|GnuPG]] and other OpenPGP-compliant systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|title=Gnu Privacy Guard|publisher=GnuPG.org|access-date=2015-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|archive-date=2015-04-29|url-status=live}}</ref> | PGP and similar software follow the OpenPGP standard ([[wikipedia:Request_for_Comments|RFC]] 4880), an [[wikipedia:Open_standard|open standard]] for [[wikipedia:Encryption|encrypting]] and decrypting [[wikipedia:Data|data]]. Modern versions of PGP are [[wikipedia:Interoperability|interoperable]] with [[wikipedia:GnuPG|GnuPG]] and other OpenPGP-compliant systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|title=Gnu Privacy Guard|publisher=GnuPG.org|access-date=2015-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|archive-date=2015-04-29|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">[https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible "Gnu Privacy Guard"]. GnuPG.org. [https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible Archived] from the original on April 29, 2015<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 26,</span> 2015</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Gnu+Privacy+Guard&rft.pub=GnuPG.org&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnupg.org%2Ffaq%2Fgnupg-faq.html%23compatible&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> | ||
The OpenPGP standard has received criticism for its long-lived keys and the difficulty in learning it,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-16|title=The PGP Problem|url=https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem|access-date=2024-11-22|author=Latacora|language=en}}</ref> as well as the [[wikipedia:EFAIL|Efail]] security vulnerability that previously arose when select e-mail programs used OpenPGP with S/MIME.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Efail: Breaking S/MIME and OpenPGP Email Encryption using Exfiltration Channels|url=https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-poddebniak.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Yen|first=Andy|date=2018-05-15|access-date=2025-01-22|title=No, PGP is not broken, not even with the Efail vulnerabilities|website=Proton|url=https://proton.me/blog/pgp-vulnerability-efail}}</ref> The new OpenPGP standard ([[wikipedia:Request_for_Comments|RFC]] 9580) has also been criticised by the maintainer of [[wikipedia:GnuPG|GnuPG]] [[wikipedia:Werner_Koch|Werner Koch]], who in response created his own specification LibrePGP.<ref name="LibrePGP">{{cite web|last1=Edge|first1=Jake|title=A schism in the OpenPGP world [LWN.net]|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|website=lwn.net|date=December 6, 2023|access-date=February 14, 2024|archive-date=February 22, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240222124116/https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|url-status=live}}</ref> This response was dividing, with some embracing his alternative specification,<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Tse|first1=Ronald|last2=Olshevsky|first2=Nickolay|date=2024-07-22|access-date=2025-01-22|title=RNP proudly supports LibrePGP|website=RNP|url=https://www.rnpgp.org/blog/2024-07-22-rnp-and-librepgp}}</ref> and others considering it to be insecure.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gallagher|first=Andrew|date=2024-09-11|access-date=2025-01-22|title=A Summary of Known Security Issues in LibrePGP|url=https://blog.pgpkeys.eu/security-issues-librepgp-2024-08.html}}</ref></blockquote> | The OpenPGP standard has received criticism for its long-lived keys and the difficulty in learning it,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-16|title=The PGP Problem|url=https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem|access-date=2024-11-22|author=Latacora|language=en}}<cite id="CITEREFLatacora2019" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Latacora (July 16, 2019). [https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem "The PGP Problem"]<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">November 22,</span> 2024</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The+PGP+Problem&rft.date=2019-07-16&rft.au=Latacora&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.latacora.com%2Fblog%2F2019%2F07%2F16%2Fthe-pgp-problem&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> as well as the [[wikipedia:EFAIL|Efail]] security vulnerability that previously arose when select e-mail programs used OpenPGP with S/MIME.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Efail: Breaking S/MIME and OpenPGP Email Encryption using Exfiltration Channels|url=https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-poddebniak.pdf}}<cite class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">[https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-poddebniak.pdf "Efail: Breaking S/MIME and OpenPGP Email Encryption using Exfiltration Channels"] <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Efail%3A+Breaking+S%2FMIME+and+OpenPGP+Email+Encryption+using+Exfiltration+Channels&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usenix.org%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fconference%2Fusenixsecurity18%2Fsec18-poddebniak.pdf&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Yen|first=Andy|date=2018-05-15|access-date=2025-01-22|title=No, PGP is not broken, not even with the Efail vulnerabilities|website=Proton|url=https://proton.me/blog/pgp-vulnerability-efail}}<cite id="CITEREFYen2018" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Yen, Andy (May 15, 2018). [https://proton.me/blog/pgp-vulnerability-efail "No, PGP is not broken, not even with the Efail vulnerabilities"]. ''Proton''<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 22,</span> 2025</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=Proton&rft.atitle=No%2C+PGP+is+not+broken%2C+not+even+with+the+Efail+vulnerabilities&rft.date=2018-05-15&rft.aulast=Yen&rft.aufirst=Andy&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fproton.me%2Fblog%2Fpgp-vulnerability-efail&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> The new OpenPGP standard ([[wikipedia:Request_for_Comments|RFC]] 9580) has also been criticised by the maintainer of [[wikipedia:GnuPG|GnuPG]] [[wikipedia:Werner_Koch|Werner Koch]], who in response created his own specification LibrePGP.<ref name="LibrePGP">{{cite web|last1=Edge|first1=Jake|title=A schism in the OpenPGP world [LWN.net]|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|website=lwn.net|date=December 6, 2023|access-date=February 14, 2024|archive-date=February 22, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240222124116/https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|url-status=live}}<cite id="CITEREFEdge2023" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Edge, Jake (December 6, 2023). [https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/ "A schism in the OpenPGP world [LWN.net]"]. ''lwn.net''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240222124116/https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/ Archived] from the original on February 22, 2024<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">February 14,</span> 2024</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=lwn.net&rft.atitle=A+schism+in+the+OpenPGP+world+%5BLWN.net%5D&rft.date=2023-12-06&rft.aulast=Edge&rft.aufirst=Jake&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F953797%2F&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> This response was dividing, with some embracing his alternative specification,<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Tse|first1=Ronald|last2=Olshevsky|first2=Nickolay|date=2024-07-22|access-date=2025-01-22|title=RNP proudly supports LibrePGP|website=RNP|url=https://www.rnpgp.org/blog/2024-07-22-rnp-and-librepgp}}<cite id="CITEREFTseOlshevsky2024" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Tse, Ronald; Olshevsky, Nickolay (July 22, 2024). [https://www.rnpgp.org/blog/2024-07-22-rnp-and-librepgp "RNP proudly supports LibrePGP"]. ''RNP''<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 22,</span> 2025</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=RNP&rft.atitle=RNP+proudly+supports+LibrePGP&rft.date=2024-07-22&rft.aulast=Tse&rft.aufirst=Ronald&rft.au=Olshevsky%2C+Nickolay&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rnpgp.org%2Fblog%2F2024-07-22-rnp-and-librepgp&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> and others considering it to be insecure.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gallagher|first=Andrew|date=2024-09-11|access-date=2025-01-22|title=A Summary of Known Security Issues in LibrePGP|url=https://blog.pgpkeys.eu/security-issues-librepgp-2024-08.html}}<cite id="CITEREFGallagher2024" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Gallagher, Andrew (September 11, 2024). [https://blog.pgpkeys.eu/security-issues-librepgp-2024-08.html "A Summary of Known Security Issues in LibrePGP"]<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 22,</span> 2025</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A+Summary+of+Known+Security+Issues+in+LibrePGP&rft.date=2024-09-11&rft.aulast=Gallagher&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.pgpkeys.eu%2Fsecurity-issues-librepgp-2024-08.html&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APretty+Good+Privacy" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref></blockquote> | ||
== Sequoia PGP == | == Sequoia PGP == | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-sqv/package.nix|sequoia-sqv}} | * {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-sqv/package.nix|sequoia-sqv}} | ||
* {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-sqop/package.nix|sequoia-sqop}} | * {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-sqop/package.nix|sequoia-sqop}} | ||
* {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg/package.nix|sequoia-chameleon-gnupg}} | * {{Nixpkg|pkgs/by-name/se/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg/package.nix|sequoia-chameleon-gnupg}} ''(note:'' {{Issue|473387|missing dependencies for <code>gpg-sq</code>}}'')'' | ||
=== NixOS === | === NixOS === | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
== GNU Privacy Guard == | == GNU Privacy Guard == | ||
From [[wikipedia:GNU_Privacy_Guard|its dedicated Wikipedia article]] :<blockquote>'''GNU Privacy Guard''' ('''GnuPG''' or '''GPG''') is a [[wikipedia:Free-software|free-software]] replacement for [[wikipedia:Symantec_Corporation|Symantec]]'s [[wikipedia:Cryptography|cryptographic]] software suite [[wikipedia:Pretty_Good_Privacy|PGP]]. The software is compliant with the now obsoleted<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9580.html|title=RFC 9580 OpenPGP|date=July 2024|publisher=IETF|website=RFC Editor|access-date=2024-12-19|last1=Wouters|first1=Paul|last2=Huigens|first2=Daniel|last3=Winter|first3=Justus|last4=Yutaka|first4=Niibe}}</ref> {{IETF RFC|4880}}[[wikipedia:RFC_(identifier)|RFC]] [https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4880 4880], the [[wikipedia:Internet_Engineering_Task_Force|IETF]] standards-track specification of [[wikipedia:OpenPGP|OpenPGP]]. Modern versions of PGP are [[wikipedia:Interoperability|interoperable]] with GnuPG and other OpenPGP v4-compliant systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|title=GnuPG Frequently Asked Questions|publisher=The GNU Privacy Guard|access-date=2015-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|archive-date=2015-04-29|url-status=live}}</ref> | From [[wikipedia:GNU_Privacy_Guard|its dedicated Wikipedia article]] :<blockquote>'''GNU Privacy Guard''' ('''GnuPG''' or '''GPG''') is a [[wikipedia:Free-software|free-software]] replacement for [[wikipedia:Symantec_Corporation|Symantec]]'s [[wikipedia:Cryptography|cryptographic]] software suite [[wikipedia:Pretty_Good_Privacy|PGP]]. The software is compliant with the now obsoleted<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9580.html|title=RFC 9580 OpenPGP|date=July 2024|publisher=IETF|website=RFC Editor|access-date=2024-12-19|last1=Wouters|first1=Paul|last2=Huigens|first2=Daniel|last3=Winter|first3=Justus|last4=Yutaka|first4=Niibe}}<cite id="CITEREFWoutersHuigensWinterYutaka2024" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Wouters, Paul; Huigens, Daniel; Winter, Justus; Yutaka, Niibe (July 2024). [https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9580.html "RFC 9580 OpenPGP"]. ''RFC Editor''. IETF<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2024-12-19</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=RFC+Editor&rft.atitle=RFC+9580+OpenPGP&rft.date=2024-07&rft.aulast=Wouters&rft.aufirst=Paul&rft.au=Huigens%2C+Daniel&rft.au=Winter%2C+Justus&rft.au=Yutaka%2C+Niibe&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Frfc%2Frfc9580.html&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AGNU+Privacy+Guard" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> {{IETF RFC|4880}}[[wikipedia:RFC_(identifier)|RFC]] [https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4880 4880], the [[wikipedia:Internet_Engineering_Task_Force|IETF]] standards-track specification of [[wikipedia:OpenPGP|OpenPGP]]. Modern versions of PGP are [[wikipedia:Interoperability|interoperable]] with GnuPG and other OpenPGP v4-compliant systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|title=GnuPG Frequently Asked Questions|publisher=The GNU Privacy Guard|access-date=2015-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible|archive-date=2015-04-29|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">[https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible "GnuPG Frequently Asked Questions"]. The GNU Privacy Guard. [https://web.archive.org/web/20150429192132/https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#compatible Archived] from the original on 2015-04-29<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-05-26</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=GnuPG+Frequently+Asked+Questions&rft.pub=The+GNU+Privacy+Guard&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnupg.org%2Ffaq%2Fgnupg-faq.html%23compatible&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AGNU+Privacy+Guard" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> | ||
November 2023 saw two drafts aiming to update the 2007 OpenPGP v4 specification (RFC4880), ultimately resulting in the RFC 9580 standard in July 2024. The proposal from the GnuPG developers, which is called LibrePGP, was not taken up by the OpenPGP Working Group and future versions of GnuPG will not support the current version of OpenPGP.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|first1=Jake|last1=Edge|date=December 6, 2023|title=A schism in the OpenPGP world|publisher=Linux Weekly News|access-date=2023-12-09}}</ref> | November 2023 saw two drafts aiming to update the 2007 OpenPGP v4 specification (RFC4880), ultimately resulting in the RFC 9580 standard in July 2024. The proposal from the GnuPG developers, which is called LibrePGP, was not taken up by the OpenPGP Working Group and future versions of GnuPG will not support the current version of OpenPGP.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/|first1=Jake|last1=Edge|date=December 6, 2023|title=A schism in the OpenPGP world|publisher=Linux Weekly News|access-date=2023-12-09}}<cite id="CITEREFEdge2023" class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="">Edge, Jake (December 6, 2023). [https://lwn.net/Articles/953797/ "A schism in the OpenPGP world"]. Linux Weekly News<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2023-12-09</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A+schism+in+the+OpenPGP+world&rft.pub=Linux+Weekly+News&rft.date=2023-12-06&rft.aulast=Edge&rft.aufirst=Jake&rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F953797%2F&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AGNU+Privacy+Guard" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span></ref> | ||
GnuPG is part of the [[wikipedia:GNU_Project|GNU Project]] and received major funding from the [[wikipedia:Politics_of_Germany|German government]] in 1999.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html|title=Bundesregierung fördert Open Source|publisher=Heise Online|language=de|date=1999-11-15|access-date=July 24, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012024601/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html|archive-date=October 12, 2013|url-status=live}} | GnuPG is part of the [[wikipedia:GNU_Project|GNU Project]] and received major funding from the [[wikipedia:Politics_of_Germany|German government]] in 1999.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html|title=Bundesregierung fördert Open Source|publisher=Heise Online|language=de|date=1999-11-15|access-date=July 24, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012024601/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html|archive-date=October 12, 2013|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation web cs1 cs1-prop-foreign-lang-source" data-ve-ignore="">[http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html "Bundesregierung fördert Open Source"] (in German). Heise Online. 1999-11-15. [https://web.archive.org/web/20131012024601/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html Archived] from the original on October 12, 2013<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 24,</span> 2013</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Bundesregierung+f%C3%B6rdert+Open+Source&rft.pub=Heise+Online&rft.date=1999-11-15&rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2FBundesregierung-foerdert-Open-Source-24110.html&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AGNU+Privacy+Guard" class="Z3988" data-ve-ignore=""></span> | ||
</ref></blockquote> | </ref></blockquote> | ||