Talk:Nixpkgs/Reviewing changes: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 13 September by L0b0 in topic How to review sub-packages?
→How to review sub-packages?: new section |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== How to review sub-packages? == | == How to review sub-packages? == | ||
I can use an overlay to review the entire set of python3Packages, but I'm unsure how I would test for example just [https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334596/files this patch]. [[User:L0b0|L0b0]] ([[User talk:L0b0|talk]]) 07:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) | I can use an overlay to review the entire set of python3Packages, but I'm unsure how I would test for example just [https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334596/files this patch]. Simply setting <code>python312Packages.pymupdf = self.review.python312Packages.pymupdf;</code>, for example, results in errors "error: attribute 'pip' missing" and "error: attribute 'python' missing". | ||
[[User:L0b0|L0b0]] ([[User talk:L0b0|talk]]) 07:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 13 September 2024
How to review sub-packages?
I can use an overlay to review the entire set of python3Packages, but I'm unsure how I would test for example just this patch. Simply setting python312Packages.pymupdf = self.review.python312Packages.pymupdf;, for example, results in errors "error: attribute 'pip' missing" and "error: attribute 'python' missing".