Talk:Filesystems: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 6 June by Pigeon in topic #SSD_TRIM_support definitely needs improvement
→#SSD TRIM support definitely needs improvement: new section |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Pigeon|Pigeon]] ([[User talk:Pigeon|talk]]) 15:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC) | [[User:Pigeon|Pigeon]] ([[User talk:Pigeon|talk]]) 15:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Also, from <code>man mount(8):</code> | |||
:<code>noatime</code> | |||
:<code>Do not update inode access times on this filesystem (e.g. for faster access on the news spool to speed up news servers). This works for all inode types (directories too),</code> <u>so it implies nodiratime.</u> | |||
:Hence everything stated above renders the whole [[Filesystems#SSD TRIM support]] section mostly redundant. I am a wiki noob so i hesitate take any actions myself. What do you think? [[User:Pigeon|Pigeon]] ([[User talk:Pigeon|talk]]) 16:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:07, 6 June 2025
#SSD_TRIM_support definitely needs improvement
1) Periodic trim is already enabled by default
2) No mention of differences between periodic and continuous trim. Continuous trim is often not recommended.
3) On btrfs, discard=sync is enabled by default and using discard (or discard=sync) is discouraged
Pigeon (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Also, from
man mount(8): noatimeDo not update inode access times on this filesystem (e.g. for faster access on the news spool to speed up news servers). This works for all inode types (directories too),so it implies nodiratime.- Hence everything stated above renders the whole Filesystems#SSD TRIM support section mostly redundant. I am a wiki noob so i hesitate take any actions myself. What do you think? Pigeon (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)