Python: Difference between revisions
imported>Hypnosis2839 m →Installation: fix syntax |
imported>Hypnosis2839 →Development shell: delete redundant section |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Then run <code>nix-shell</code> to use the shell. | Then run <code>nix-shell</code> to use the shell. | ||
== Using alternative packages == | == Using alternative packages == |
Revision as of 14:38, 31 January 2024
Installation
Python is a development package, and not meant to go in your system or home configuration.
If you need access to python for development, create a shell.nix
for the specific project, along with any libraries needed:
let
pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {};
in pkgs.mkShell {
packages = [
(pkgs.python3.withPackages (python-pkgs: [
python-pkgs.pandas
python-pkgs.requests
]))
];
Then run nix-shell
to use the shell.
Using alternative packages
We saw above how to install Python packages using nixpkgs. Since these are written by hand by nixpkgs maintainers, it isn't uncommon for packages you want to be missing or out of date. To create a custom Python environment with your own package(s), first create a derivation for each python package (look at examples in the python-modules
subfolder in Nixpkgs). Then, use those derivations with callPackage
as follows:
with pkgs;
let
my-python-package = ps: ps.callPackage ./my-package.nix {};
python-with-my-packages = python3.withPackages(ps: with ps; [
(my-python-package ps)
]);
in ...
Package and development shell for a python project
It is possible to use buildPythonApplication
to package python applications. As explained in the nixpkgs manual, it uses the widely used `setup.py` file in order to package properly the application. We now show how to package a simple python application: a basic flask web server.
First, we write the python code, say in a file web_interface.py
. Here we create a basic flask web server;
#!/usr/bin/env python
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/')
def hello_world():
return 'Hello, World!'
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(host="0.0.0.0", port=8080)
Then, we create the setup.py
file, which basically explains which are the executables:
#!/usr/bin/env python
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
setup(name='demo-flask-vuejs-rest',
version='1.0',
# Modules to import from other scripts:
packages=find_packages(),
# Executables
scripts=["web_interface.py"],
)
Finally, our nix derivation is now trivial: the file derivation.nix
just needs to provide the python packages (here flask):
{ lib, python3Packages }:
with python3Packages;
buildPythonApplication {
pname = "demo-flask-vuejs-rest";
version = "1.0";
propagatedBuildInputs = [ flask ];
src = ./.;
}
and we can now load this derivation from our file default.nix
:
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
pkgs.callPackage ./derivation.nix {}
We can now build with:
$ nix-build
[...]
$ ./result/bin/web_interface.py
* Serving Flask app ".web_interface" (lazy loading)
[...]
or just enter a nix-shell, and directly execute your program or python if it's easier to develop:
$ nix-shell
[...]
[nix-shell]$ chmod +x web_interface.py
[nix-shell]$ ./web_interface.py
* Serving Flask app "web_interface" (lazy loading)
[...]
[nix-shell]$ python
Python 3.8.7 (default, Dec 21 2020, 17:18:55)
[GCC 10.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import flask
>>>
Python virtual environment
Starting from Python 3 virtual environment is natively supported. The Python 3 venv approach has the benefit of forcing you to choose a specific version of the Python 3 interpreter that should be used to create the virtual environment. This avoids any confusion as to which Python installation the new environment is based on.
Recommended usage:
- Python 3.3-3.4 (old): the recommended way to create a virtual environment was to use the pyvenv command-line tool that also comes included with your Python 3 installation by default.
- Python 3.6+:
python3 -m venv
is the way to go.
Put your packages in a requirements.txt:
pandas
requests
Then setup the virtualenv:
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
Installing packages with pip
that need to compile code or use C libraries will sometimes fail due to not finding dependencies in the expected places. In that case you can use buildFHSUserEnv
to make yourself a sandbox that appears like a more typical Linux install (or you can also certainly use nix-ld
to turn your whole system into a more standard Linux distribution). For example if you were working with machine learning code you could use:
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
(pkgs.buildFHSUserEnv {
name = "pipzone";
targetPkgs = pkgs: (with pkgs; [
python39
python39Packages.pip
python39Packages.virtualenv
cudaPackages.cudatoolkit
]);
runScript = "bash";
}).env
In pip-shell.nix
, and enter the environment with:
nix-shell pip-shell.nix
virtualenv venv
source venv/bin/activate
Virtualenv without nix on NixOS
Another option is to follow the fix-python gist to setup a virtualenv without explicitly entering a nix shell.
Emulating virtualenv with nix-shell
In some cases virtualenv fails to install a library because it requires patching on NixOS (example 1, example 2, general issue). In this cases it is better to replace those libraries with ones from Nix.
Let's say, that nanomsg library fails to install in virtualenv. Then write a shell.nix
file:
let
pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {};
nanomsg-py = ...build expression for this python library...;
in pkgs.mkShell {
buildInputs = [
pkgs.python3
pkgs.python3.pkgs.requests
nanomsg-py
];
shellHook = ''
# Tells pip to put packages into $PIP_PREFIX instead of the usual locations.
# See https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/user_guide/#environment-variables.
export PIP_PREFIX=$(pwd)/_build/pip_packages
export PYTHONPATH="$PIP_PREFIX/${pkgs.python3.sitePackages}:$PYTHONPATH"
export PATH="$PIP_PREFIX/bin:$PATH"
unset SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
'';
}
After entering the environment with `nix-shell`, you can install new python libraries with dump `pip install`, but nanomsg will be detected as installed.
Discussion and consequences of this approach are in PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/55265.
micromamba
Install the micromamba
package.
You can create environments and install packages as documented by micromamba e.g.
micromamba create -n my-environment python=3.9 numpy=1.23.0 -c conda-forge
To activate an environment you will need a FHS environment e.g.:
$ nix-shell -E 'with import <nixpkgs> {}; (pkgs.buildFHSUserEnv { name = "fhs"; }).env'
$ eval "$(micromamba shell hook -s bash)"
$ micromamba activate my-environment
$ python
>>> import numpy as np
Eventually you'll probably want to put this in a shell.nix so you won't have to type all that stuff every time e.g.:
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}}:
let
fhs = pkgs.buildFHSUserEnv {
name = "my-fhs-environment";
targetPkgs = _: [
pkgs.micromamba
];
profile = ''
set -e
eval "$(micromamba shell hook -s bash)"
export MAMBA_ROOT_PREFIX=${builtins.getEnv "PWD"}/.mamba
micromamba create -q -n my-mamba-environment
micromamba activate my-mamba-environment
micromamba install --yes -f conda-requirements.txt -c conda-forge
set +e
'';
};
in fhs.env
conda
Install the package conda
and run
conda-shell
conda-install
conda env update --file environment.yml
Imperative use
It is also possible to use conda-install
directly.
On first use, run
conda-shell
conda-install
to set up conda in ~/.conda
pip2nix
pip2nix generate nix expressions for Python packages.
Also see the pypi2nix-project (abandoned in 2019).
Contribution guidelines
Libraries
According to the official guidelines for python new package expressions for libraries should be placed in pkgs/development/python-modules/<name>/default.nix
. Those expressions are then referenced from pkgs/top-level/python-packages.nix
like in this example:
{
aenum = callPackage ../development/python-modules/aenum { };
}
The reasoning behind this is the large size of pkgs/top-level/python-packages.nix
.
Applications
Python applications instead should be referenced directly from pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
.
The expression should take pythonPackages
as one of the arguments, which guarantees that packages belong to the same set. For example:
{ lib
, pythonPackages
}:
with pythonPackages;
buildPythonApplication rec {
# ...
Special Modules
GNOME
gobject-introspection
based python modules need some environment variables to work correctly. For standalone
applications, wrapGAppsHook
(see the relevant documentation) wraps the executable with the necessary variables. But this is not fit for development.
In this case use a nix-shell
with gobject-introspection
and all the libraries you are using (gtk and so on) as buildInputs
.
For example:
$ nix-shell -p gobjectIntrospection gtk3 'python2.withPackages (ps: with ps; [ pygobject3 ])' --run "python -c \"import pygtkcompat; pygtkcompat.enable_gtk(version='3.0')\""
Or, if you want to use matplotlib interactively:
$ nix-shell -p gobject-introspection gtk3 'python36.withPackages(ps : with ps; [ matplotlib pygobject3 ipython ])'
$ ipython
In [1]: import matplotlib
In [2]: matplotlib.use('gtk3agg')
In [3]: import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
In [4]: plt.ion()
In [5]: plt.plot([1,3,2,4])
You can also set backend : GTK3Agg
in your ~/.config/matplotlib/matplotlibrc
file to avoid having to call matplotlib.use('gtk3agg')
.
Performance
The derivation of cPython that is available via nixpkgs
does not contain optimizations enabled, specifically Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) and Link Time Optimization (LTO). See Configuring Python 3.1.3. Performance options
Additionally, when you compile something within nix-shell
or a derivation; by default there are security hardening flags passed to the compiler which do have a small performance impact.
As of the time of this writing; these optimizations cause Python builds to be non-reproducible and increase install times for the derivation. For a more detailed overview of the trials and tabulations of discovering the performance regression; see Why is the nix-compiled Python slower? thread on the nix forums.
Regression
With the nixpkgs
version of Python you can expect anywhere from a 30-40% regression on synthetic benchmarks. For example:
## Ubuntu's Python 3.8
username:dir$ python3.8 -c "import timeit; print(timeit.Timer('for i in range(100): oct(i)', 'gc.enable()').repeat(5))"
[7.831622750498354, 7.82998560462147, 7.830805554986, 7.823807033710182, 7.84282516874373]
## nix-shell's Python 3.8
[nix-shell:~/src]$ python3.8 -c "import timeit; print(timeit.Timer('for i in range(100): oct(i)', 'gc.enable()').repeat(5))"
[10.431915327906609, 10.435049421153963, 10.449542525224388, 10.440207410603762, 10.431304694153368]
However, synthetic benchmarks are not a reflection of a real-world use case. In most situations, the performance difference between optimized & non-optimized interpreters is minimal. For example; using pylint
with a significant number of custom linters to go scan a very large Python codebase (>6000 files) resulted in only a 5.5% difference, instead of 40%. Other workflows that were not performance sensitive saw no impact to their run times.
Possible Optimizations
If you run code that heavily depends on Python performance (data science, machine learning), and you want to have the most performant Python interpreter possible, here are some possible things you can do:
- Enable the
enableOptimizations
flag for your Python derivation. Example Do note that this will cause you to compile Python the first time that you run it; which will take a few minutes. - Switch to a newer version of Python. In the example above, going from 3.8 to 3.10 yielded an average 7.5% performance improvement; but this is only a single benchmark. Switching versions most likely won't make all your code 7.5% faster.
- Disable hardening, although this only yields a small performance boost; and it has impacts beyond Python code. Hardening in Nixpkgs
Ultimately, it is up to your use case to determine if you need an optimized version of the Python interpreter. We encourage you to benchmark and test your code to determine if this is something that would benefit you.
Troubleshotting
My module cannot be imported
If you are unable to do `import yourmodule` there are a number of reasons that could explain that.
First, make sure that you installed/added your module to python. Typically you would use something like (python3.withPackages (ps: with ps; [ yourmodule ]))
in the list of installed applications.
Then, if you packaged yourself your application, make sure to use buildPythonPackage
and **not** buildPythonApplication
or stdenv.mkDerivation
. The reason is that python3.withPackages
filters the packages to check that they are built using the appropriate python interpreter: this is done by verifying that the derivation has a pythonModule
attribute and only buildPythonPackage sets this value (passthru here) thanks to, notably passthru = { pythonModule = python; }
. If you used stdenv.mkDerivation
then you can maybe set this value manually, but it's safer to simply use buildPythonPackage {format = "other"; … your derivation …}
instead of mkDerivation
.