Talk:Packaging/Binaries: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 October 2021 by Nix in topic untrusted binaries
imported>Milahu No edit summary |
imported>Nix No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:Milahu|Milahu]] ([[User talk:Milahu|talk]]) 16:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC) | --[[User:Milahu|Milahu]] ([[User talk:Milahu|talk]]) 16:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
: A virtual machine is most robust. X11docker a good combo; x11docker supports [https://katacontainers.io/ Kata Containers], which aims to combine the security of VMs with speed of containers. [[Security]] a good page for this too. — [[User:Nix|Nix]] ([[User talk:Nix|talk]]) 09:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:19, 2 October 2021
untrusted binaries
packaging and running untrusted binaries on nixos?
- NixOS Containers?
- firejail?
- virtual machine?
- https://github.com/mviereck/x11docker - "Run GUI applications and desktops in docker. Focus on security." (via stackexchange)
for example jdownloader is closed source, so i want to limit access to files, clipboard, etc.
--Milahu (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- A virtual machine is most robust. X11docker a good combo; x11docker supports Kata Containers, which aims to combine the security of VMs with speed of containers. Security a good page for this too. — Nix (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)