Cross Compiling: Difference between revisions
imported>Symphorien add snippet using lib.systems.example |
imported>Danbst lazy cross compiling |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
See also {{issue|49526}}. | See also {{issue|49526}}. | ||
== Lazy cross-compiling == | |||
If you target "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu", there is a nice way to reduce amount of cross-compiling and side-step journey to fix cross errors. The idea is to fetch non-essential dependencies from binary cache of regular aarch64 binaries. | |||
Say we are building SDL2. | |||
<syntaxhighlight lang="nix"> | |||
let | |||
# this will use aarch64 binaries from binary cache, so no need to build those | |||
pkgsArm = import <nixpkgs> { | |||
config = {}; | |||
overlays = []; | |||
system = "aarch64-linux"; | |||
}; | |||
# these will be your cross packages | |||
pkgsCross = import <nixpkgs> { | |||
overlays = [(self: super: { | |||
# we want to hack on SDL, don't want to hack on those. Some even don't cross-compile | |||
inherit (pkgsArm) | |||
xorg libpulseaudio libGL guile systemd libxkbcommon | |||
; | |||
})]; | |||
crossSystem = { | |||
config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"; | |||
}; | |||
}; | |||
in pkgsCross.SDL2.override { | |||
# those shouldn't be neither pkgsCross, nor pkgsArm | |||
# because those trigger | |||
# cannot execute binary file: Exec format error | |||
# in this case it was enough to just use buildPackages variants | |||
# but in general there may be problems | |||
inherit (pkgsCross.buildPackages) | |||
wayland wayland-protocols | |||
; | |||
} | |||
</syntaxhighlight> | |||
== How to specify dependencies == | == How to specify dependencies == |
Revision as of 20:29, 15 February 2020
For building arm software check out the Article NixOS on ARM
If you are looking for building 32bit software, check out Packaging/32bit Applications
Quick example to cross compile a package: Cheatsheet#Cross-compile_packages.
Cross-Compiling in nixpkgs unstable (pre-18.09)
A lot has happened in 2018 and now cross-compilation is well supported within the unstable branch of nixpkgs.
The basic idea is to use pkgsCross.platform
instead of pkgs
:
nix build -f channel:nixos-unstable pkgsCross.raspberryPi.emacs
How to obtain a shell with a cross compiler
Create a file crossShell.nix
as follows:
with import <nixpkgs> {
crossSystem = {
config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu";
};
};
mkShell {
buildInputs = [ zlib ]; # your dependencies here
}
and then use it to obtain a shell:
nix-shell crossShell.nix
The resulting shell contains a cross toolchain and zlib in this example. Note that contrary to native shells, the compiler and some other tools are prefixed: there is no gcc
but a aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
. Some convenience environment variables expand to the prefixed version of tools: $CC
, $LD
...
Examples of how to specify your target system can be found in lib/systems/examples.nix. If the exact system you are targeting is available in this file then you can use the existing definition as in the following example:
let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {
crossSystem = (import <nixpkgs/lib>).systems.examples.armv7l-hf-multiplatform;
};
in
...
The examples above do not work as is with build dependencies (nativeBuildInputs
). A solution is to use callPackage
to enable splicing:
let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {
crossSystem = {
config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu";
};
};
in
pkgs.callPackage (
{mkShell, pkg-config, zlib}:
mkShell {
nativeBuildInputs = [ pkg-config ]; # you build dependencies here
buildInputs = [ zlib ]; # your dependencies here
}
) {}
See also #49526.
Lazy cross-compiling
If you target "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu", there is a nice way to reduce amount of cross-compiling and side-step journey to fix cross errors. The idea is to fetch non-essential dependencies from binary cache of regular aarch64 binaries.
Say we are building SDL2.
let
# this will use aarch64 binaries from binary cache, so no need to build those
pkgsArm = import <nixpkgs> {
config = {};
overlays = [];
system = "aarch64-linux";
};
# these will be your cross packages
pkgsCross = import <nixpkgs> {
overlays = [(self: super: {
# we want to hack on SDL, don't want to hack on those. Some even don't cross-compile
inherit (pkgsArm)
xorg libpulseaudio libGL guile systemd libxkbcommon
;
})];
crossSystem = {
config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu";
};
};
in pkgsCross.SDL2.override {
# those shouldn't be neither pkgsCross, nor pkgsArm
# because those trigger
# cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
# in this case it was enough to just use buildPackages variants
# but in general there may be problems
inherit (pkgsCross.buildPackages)
wayland wayland-protocols
;
}
How to specify dependencies
Depending in which if packages are required at build time or at runtime they need to go to different inputs the derivation.
- If it is used at build-time it's
depsBuildXXX
- compiler producing native binaries go to
depsBuildBuild
- compiler producing cross binaries, all setup hooks and programs executed by the builder go to
depsBuildHost
- common examples:
pkgconfig, autoreconfHook, makeWrapper, intltool, bison, flex
- common examples:
- compiler producing native binaries go to
- If it is used at run-time it's
depsHostXXX
. [Stack linking doesn't effect this, even if it allows us to forget where things came from.]- if it’s an interpreter that will be needed by an installed script, it should go in
depsHostTarget
. - otherwise it is probably only needed at build time and can go in
depsBuildHost
- if it’s an interpreter that will be needed by an installed script, it should go in
- If it is a tool and "acts" (e.g. helps build) on build-time stuff, then it's
depsXXXBuild
- If it is a tool and "acts" on run-time stuff, then it's
depsXXXHost
- if it is not a tool, it's
depsXXX(XXX+1)
(build + 1 == host, host +1 == target) for backwards compatibility, usenativeBuildInputs
instead ofdepsBuildHost
andbuildInputs
instead ofdepsHostTarget
.
Source: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/50881#issuecomment-440772499
References
- Nixpkgs manual on cross compiling
- Nixpkgs manual on Specifying dependencies